Ind AS

Ind AS 118 and Schedule III: Closing the Format Gap

Ind AS 118’s biggest Indian friction is not conceptual — it is format. Division II of Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 still prescribes a statement of profit and loss that does not show a defined operating profit line, keeps finance costs inside total expenses, and analyses expenses by nature. Listed entities also report quarterly results under SEBI formats that currently mirror that structure.

Where the formats clash

What NFRA has recommended

In recommending Ind AS 118 for notification (with a proposed effective date of periods beginning on or after 1 April 2027), NFRA also flagged the need for consequential work by other regulators. Publicly discussed recommendations include:

Until those consequential changes land, companies should design the “true” Ind AS 118 presentation for group and investor reporting, and maintain a clear mapping to the legal / SEBI formats that remain in force.

Tax and MAT comfort

Because Ind AS 118 is a presentation and disclosure standard, profit after tax does not change merely from reordering lines. Book profit computations that start from reported PAT are therefore not inherently disturbed — but companies should still document the bridge from Ind AS 118 lines to Schedule III and tax workpapers.

Working approach while formats catch up

  1. Maintain a dual mapping: Ind AS 118 categories ↔ Schedule III / SEBI line items.
  2. Keep MPM inventory and reconciliations ready even if quarterly formats cannot yet host the full note.
  3. Brief the audit committee on residual differences between investor packs and statutory formats.
  4. Monitor MCA notification language and any Schedule III / SEBI amendments in the same package.

Design to the standard; keep a mapping to the format. The format will follow.

Regulatory formats change by notification and circular. Verify current Schedule III, SEBI LODR formats and MCA / NFRA updates before filing.